lvs-users
|
To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Memory leak |
From: | "jarol1@xxxxxxxxx" <J.Libak@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 17 Dec 2006 10:53:54 +0100 |
abang wrote: If you can't use the latest kernel 2.6.19-1 then you have to scrap the solution.Is the number of connections (active and inactive) constant after several minutes? I tested LVS + TUN with 60000 SYN packets per second from 16 000 000 different IP addresses to drain director's memory and it seemed to be freeing memory correctly on a 2.6.18-3 kernel.Yes, after the timeout value (tcpfin) is the number of connections constant. ip_vs_conn in /proc/slabinfo is also constant after a short time. Unfortunately I can not use 2.6.18. Because I need to use SLES :-( Jaro Regards Winfried _______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Memory leak, abang |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Memory leak, abang |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Memory leak, abang |
Next by Thread: | Re: Memory leak, abang |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |