Re: Reports of bad headers using TUN?

[Nigel Hamilton <nigel@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> > Just got back one customer's response. Said the test page worked fine
> > for her.
> Scratch that. I misunderstood her. She sent a screen shot from Firefox and 
> IE. IE7 simply reloaded the page but Firefox showed the "bad request" page. 
> And the webserver logs on that node show this "request failed: error reading 
> the headers,"
> So that means we know what the problem is now? We know that its packet 
> fragmenting? I guess this one chick is behind some super-duper firewall 
> that's not liking it?
> I am suposed to apply that iptable's rule onto the real servers right?

Hi Matthew,

        Yes. I think that's the plan. Let us know how it goes?

NIge




> -Matthew
>
> Matthew wrote:
> > No because I wanted to check to see if that was indeed the case before 
> > applying the fix. I read in the HOWTO that applying the iptable rule caused 
> > other problems with other people.
> > -Matthwe
> >
> > Joseph Mack NA3T wrote:
> > > On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, Matthew wrote:
> > >
> > > > The fact that more people are having this issue is starting to worry me.
> > > did you apply the fix(es) in the HOWTO before you asked people to run the 
> > > test?
> > > Joe
> > _______________________________________________
> > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users