lvs-users
|
To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: Geographically distant load balancing (er, I mean failover) |
From: | Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:12:02 -0800 (PST) |
On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, Dan Brown wrote: Once you've detected failure, do you have a plan for moving the IPs to the backup site?This is the thing I am unsure about. If trying to do this on the same network, can I simply have a director assume the router IP and the block of IPs and have it be on it's merry way? as long as the upstream part of the network knows how to route the packets to the new director and can change the routing in the expected timescale you want for failover Joe -- Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux! |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: Geographically distant load balancing (er, I mean failover), Dan Brown |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: Geographically distant load balancing (er, I mean failover), Joseph Mack NA3T |
Previous by Thread: | RE: Geographically distant load balancing (er, I mean failover), Dan Brown |
Next by Thread: | RE: Geographically distant load balancing (er, I mean failover), Joseph Mack NA3T |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |