Is this normal with LVS or there can be some specific configuration
required
in this regard?
Yes it´s normal. For real servers health checking I use keepalived
www.keepalived.org.
When one of the server of the LVS server pool is down, keepalived informs
the linux kernel via a setsockopt call to remove this server entrie from the
LVS topology.
When the server comes up, keepalived add it again.
Its very usefull and easy for implement.
good luck!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mansoor Ali" <mhafeez72@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 10:25 AM
Subject: Linux LVS Server
Hello guys
I want to ask one thing about the Linux LVS Solution. I have setup the
LVS-NAT solution, it worked fine but i m having one small issue onto it.
If one of my real server is down,switched-off the Director does not detect
it immediatley as well the connections are not forwarded immediately to
the second Real Server. At times even it is very difficult to make
connection with the Second Real Server.
Is this normal with LVS or there can be some specific configuration
required in this regard?
Mani Ali
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Hotmail is evolving - check out the new Windows Live Mail
http://ideas.live.com
_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|