|
So ultramonkey/hA should be on the nodes as well as the directors?
I thought it was only for the directors so it the redundant one will
take over the VIP when the main director fails?
On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 12:28 +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 12:32:50AM +0200, it-intuition wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I run a two node loadbalancer with ldirectord (version 1.2.5-1) and
> > heartbeat (version 1.2.5-1) on Debian Sarge for several months now. Now
> > I discovered that the first node always sends two requests to our
> > webservers and the second node only sends one request. Does this issue
> > belong to my outdated versions of ldirectord+heartbeat (I know I should
> > update to version 1.2.5-3 ...) or did I misconfigure the hole thing?
> > Anyhow, the loadbalancer acts as expected.
>
> How are you starting ldirectord. If you have it listed in linux-ha's
> haresorces file, then it should only run on the active node and you
> shouldn't see the connection duplication that you observed. If you
> run ldirectord standalone from init then you will.
>
> I personally don't think that extra checks are a problem. But
> if they bother you, try the haresources approach.
>
Kind Regards,
Peter Biggerstaff
Linux Desktop Development Specialist
Open source project wiki: http://mmhapollo04/wiki/
Open source project blog: http://mmhapollo04/wiki/index.php/Project_blog
P 09 276 00 00 F 09 276 0256 Ext 2478 M 021 784 167
peter.biggerstaff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx www.healthalliance.co.nz
healthAlliance
New Zealand
- = Visit the HealthAlliance website at http://www.healthalliance.co.nz
= -
This e-mail message and any accompanying attachments may contain information
that is confidential and subject to legal privilege. If you are not the
intended recipient, do not read, use, disseminate, distribute or copy this
message or attachments. If you have received this message in error, please
notify the sender immediately and delete this message.
|
