|
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 06:56:28AM -0500, Rudd, Michael wrote:
> My 2 cents in dealing with DNS and your idea of the OPS feature. I have
> implemented the OPS feature into the 2.6 kernel and its running well.
> Without that feature, we wound up having all the DNS queries from our
> DNS client get sent to the same realserver.
Thanks for the feedback, its very useful.
> The problem we did run into, which I've gotten help from the community
> on, is when using LVS-NAT, the source packet isn't SNAT'd. This is
> because LVS on the outgoing packet doesn't know the packet is an LVS
> packet, so it just forwards it out. I fixed this with an iptables rule
> to SNAT it myself.
Mmm, I guess OPS isn't quite the right solution to the DNS problem :(
--
Horms
H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/
W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/
|
