Re: LVS Balancing

[lists <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Antoni,

That would logically imply that the server is failing to respond to 
health checks within the timeout,
try increasing the timeout.


Upblogger.com wrote:
> Hello,
>
>  
>
> Is this behavior normal? My RS1 is receiving 60-70% more traffic than RS2.
> Both of them have the same configuration/hardware. Every 30-60 seconds
> keepalived deletes RS2 from LVS load balancing.
>
>  
>
> IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096)
>
> Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
>
>   -> RemoteAddress:Port           Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
>
> TCP  LVS_VIRTUAL_IP:http rr persistent 50
>
>   -> REALSERVER_2:http            Tunnel  1      158        95
>
>   -> REALSERVER_1:http            Tunnel  1      381        479
>
>  
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Antoni
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>