|
I might just create a new network for the real servers, seems much easier ;)
Thanks
Mark
Graeme Fowler wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 15:40 +0100, Mark Wadham wrote:
>
>> Is this a bad thing?
>>
>
> No. But it means you need to do extra $stuff to make it work.
>
> Briefly, in a one-network LVS-NAT the replies from the realservers will
> try to get back to the clients via the most direct route. This means
> that they bypass the director, therefore the reverse NAT translation
> doesn't happen, and the connection hangs up and eventually times out.
>
> You need to force all responses from realservers back through the
> director for LVS-NAT to work.
>
> There's several good explanations of how to do this in the HOWTO and the
> list archives.
>
> If you can't find them, or they're not very clear, feel free to ask
> again.
>
> Graeme
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
--
Mark Wadham
e: mark.wadham@xxxxxxxxx t: +44 (0)20 8315 5800 f: +44 (0)20 8315 5801
Areti Internet Ltd., http://www.areti.net/
===================================================================
Areti Internet Ltd: BS EN ISO 9001:2000
Providing corporate Internet solutions for more than 10 years.
===================================================================
|
