LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [lvs-users] Need help determining if LVS is for us

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] Need help determining if LVS is for us
From: Rio <rio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 18:46:32 -0400
On Thursday 21 June 2007 16:43, Joseph Mack NA3T wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Rio wrote:
> 
> > i assume here you mean because there would be 2 copies of 
> > each mailbox with no control over which copy a user reads.
> 
> yes
> 
> > the mail server software (surgemail) has built-in 2-way 
> > mirroring that updates each other within milliseconds of a 
> > change..
> 
> This has always been a bit of a problem. I didn't know about 
> surgemail. I see it's not GPL/FOSS. I can't imagine it would 
> be too hard to add this to GPL mailservers.
> 

probably not, the biggest problem being that most gpl servers are 
multi-software to enable smtp/pop etc. so mirroring would have to be on 
several levels, or an additonal software addon... surgemail is integrated 
although can be separated in to individual smtp/pop with just ip addressing. 
it is somewhat expensive, but after seeing all the features it had i fell in 
love with it. the mirroring is done very smartly. been running it 3 yrs and 
never looked back.


> >> You'll need two if you want failover.
> >
> > failovers of directors, but if, say, one director handles 
> > 2 ips for 2 identical services on 2 servers, if one server 
> > goes down does that not do auto-failover for the real 
> > server portion?
> 
> there's too many "servers" in there. You can failover 
> one-by-one individual services running on the realservers 
> too if that's what you're asking. That is also handled by 
> external packages like mon, ldirectord and keepalived.
> 

yes i would need to failover every guest vserver individually in addition to 
the host itself. there are dangers of an 'owner' trashing his colo virtual, 
or i may need to shut down one particular one for some reason. if i mean to 
shut it down for non-payment then i just have to do it twice :) otherwise i 
expect the other to pick up the slack till i bring it back up.

this sounds like the area of study i need to be at. just have to learn the 
various configurations to figure out what is for us, but it looks like lvs is 
the way for us.

thank you!

> Joe
> -- 
> Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
> jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
> generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
> Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
> 

-- 

Rio



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>