![]() |
lvs-users
|
| To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [lvs-users] LVS-TUN v. LVS-DR |
| From: | Gerry Reno <greno@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 27 Jun 2007 22:09:07 -0400 |
I'm looking at implementing one of these two LVS methods. So as I understand it if I choose LVS-DR then I'm limited to having the LB and RS on the same physical network. But if I choose LVS-TUN then I have to be prepared to absorb the overhead associated with the repackaging. My questions: Is there some doc that quantifies the level of overhead for LVS-TUN in comparison to LVS-DR? In terms of scalability is there some absolute upper limits for either LVS-TUN or LVS-DR? Gerry |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [lvs-users] multiple IP on same NICs, wlx |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [lvs-users] Q: SIP module for LVS, Vitaly Karasik |
| Previous by Thread: | [lvs-users] Load balancer question, Konstantin Ivanov |
| Next by Thread: | [lvs-users] Q: SIP module for LVS, Vitaly Karasik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |