![]() |
lvs-users
|
| To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [lvs-users] keepalived: SSH getting "No route to host" |
| From: | Con Tassios <ct@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:34:39 +1000 (EST) |
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Gerry Reno wrote: > I have setup a stanza in keepalived.conf for SSH to use an alternate > port. But whenever I try to ssh into the VIP on the alternate port I > get a "No route to host". It looks like it gets to the director but it > never gets to the real server. I see an immediate inactive connection > in IPVS. All firewalls on both directors and real servers are down. > keepalived is 1.1.13. All the other IPVS traffic is behaving correctly, > 80, 8080, 443. Would you need something like this on the real servers? iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 33322 -j REDIRECT --to-port 22 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [lvs-users] keepalived: SSH getting "No route to host", Gerry Reno |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [lvs-users] LVS-NAT simple (?) setup not working in mysterious way?, lists |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [lvs-users] keepalived: SSH getting "No route to host", Gerry Reno |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [lvs-users] keepalived: SSH getting "No route to host", Gerry Reno |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |