Re: [lvs-users] failover problem on real server failure

To: " users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] failover problem on real server failure
From: "Glunk, Thomas" <thomas.glunk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:02:48 +0100
Thanks for the quick respons. I will setup a monitor application.

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Graeme Fowler
Gesendet: Freitag, 16. November 2007 13:43
An: users mailing list.
Betreff: Re: [lvs-users] failover problem on real server failure


On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 13:26 +0100, Glunk, Thomas wrote:
> Now the problem. If one Windows 2003 Server is off, we cannot connect to the 
> remaining terminal server. I tried a lot with and without persitant, but 
> there is no difference. It looks like that lvs don´t recognize that one 
> server is down an redirect all new connections to the other server. Is this a 
> problem of the running version of lvs or maybe a setup problem?

If you're not running a healthcheck framework over the top of LVS, you
won't detect the failure. LVS itself only does load balancing - not
system monitoring.

You may want to use keepalived, ldirectord or some other consolidated
application that can manage your system for you both in terms of LVS
setup and server/service monitoring.


Sage bäurer GmbH
Firmensitz: Auf der Steig 6, 78052 Villingen-Schwenningen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Freiburg i. Br., HRB 611793
Geschäftsführer: Franz Bruckmaier, Dr. Thomas Scholtis

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>