LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [lvs-users] ldirectord SimpleTCP service check [PATCH]

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] ldirectord SimpleTCP service check [PATCH]
From: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 16:08:50 +0900
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 03:17:59PM -0600, Aaron Linnen wrote:
> Simon Horman wrote:
> >On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 08:41:27AM -0600, Aaron Linnen wrote:
> >  
> >>I have a service with a custom protocol that I'm load balancing and I 
> >>didn't 
> >>find an easy way to get that going with ldirectord. I came up with a quick 
> >>modification that enabled what I needed, but would appreciate comments or, 
> >>ideally including similar functionality in future releases.
> >>
> >>It's a new service type called simpletcp, and is configured like so:
> >>virtual = 192.168.44.3:10301
> >>        protocol = tcp
> >>        scheduler = wlc
> >>        real = 192.168.45.4:10301 gate 100
> >>        real = 192.168.45.5:10301 gate 100
> >>        service = simpletcp
> >>        request = "command\narg\n.\n"
> >>        receive = "^\+OK"
> >>
> >>The check simply sends the request string down the connection and tests 
> >>against the receive regex. My perl-foo is weak these days, so I'm sure 
> >>there 
> >>are some easy improvements that could be made.
> >>    
> >
> >Hi Arron,
> >
> >thanks for your patch. This idea looks like a good one to me and
> >I'm quite happy to push it into the next release (or the one after that,
> >as the next release is close to going out the door).
> >
> >A few things:
> >
> >* How well have you tested this? Its unlikely to break anything except
> >  itself, but its good to get an idea anyway.
> >* Can you add something to the documentation at the top of ldirectord?
> >  Perhaps doding this as a second patch would work well.
> >* Your patch seemed to replace all tabs with spaces so it didn't apply.
> >  I manually fixed this up and the fixed version is below.
> >* If at all possible could you provide a sign-off line as described
> >  in section 5 of http://linux.yyz.us/patch-format.html
> >  Thats basically to say this is your work and you are ok with
> >  it going into a GPL project.
> >  
> 
> Hi Horms, thanks for the interest.
> 
> We're only in development mode here right now, but it's stood up well
> under the testing we have done including some load testing. The code
> is pretty much just the check_sip code, with the request swapped out.
> 
> Patch attached with some tiny bits of documentation. Sorry about the
> previous patch. hopefully this one will come through correctly.
> 
> One area I see potential improvement is the \n handling - I can see
> the need for at least \r as well, probably others. I was looking for a
> quick way to have perl parse the line as it does string literals in
> code so that all the same perl escape syntax could be used (enabling
> embedded nulls or other binary data), but didn't see an easy way and I
> didn't need that for the current project so I left it. If someone
> knows a simple, safe and secure way to enable that, I think it would
> really improve this to where it can be used in as many circumstances
> as possible.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aaron J. Linnen <aaron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi Aaron,

this all looks fine to me. I have applied both your patches
and they should show up in the next release.

http://hg.linux-ha.org/dev/rev/80134dfbf9ec
http://hg.linux-ha.org/dev/rev/9c2436e4458a


-- 
Horms



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>