Re: [lvs-users] lvs-direct..stumped: arp or not to arp?

To: " users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] lvs-direct..stumped: arp or not to arp?
From: "William Ottley" <williamottley@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 09:01:43 -0500

hmmm so you're saying that the LVS acts as a web gw?
that all the traffic goes back to the LVS and then to the client?
so i don't need to have a firewall and site-to-site?
Just make the LVS with 2 nics, iptables, and do LVS-TUN?

and well that's the other thing: where's a good howto on setting up a
TUN with LVS...what software, ipsec?, etc
I'm using centOS 5.1, but I could go to another distro, if its
specifically made for LVS...

On Dec 29, 2007 8:52 AM, Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Dec 2007, Joseph Mack NA3T wrote:
> >>
> >> See, we need to "hide" all of the webservers from the internet
> so does everyone else, but the realservers are already
> hidden from the internet by the design of LVS
> Joe
> --
> Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
> jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
> generator at
> Homepage It's GNU/Linux!
> _______________________________________________
> mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to

Morpheus: After this, there is no turning back. You take the blue pill
- the story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you
want to believe. You take the red pill - you stay in Wonderland and I
show you how deep the rabbit-hole goes.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>