|
-----Original Message-----
From: lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Matthew Crocker
Sent: Wed 1/2/2008 1:38 PM
To: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] LVS in an Active/Active configuration
...snip...
Edge routers will see two equal cost routes via OSPF
1.2.4.1/28 via 1.2.3.6
1.2.4.1/28 via 1.2.3.6
I think you mean .7 --^
Cisco per-flow load balancing will install both routes into the router
FIB and load balance inbound traffic to each director.
LVS-NAT won't work because of the requirement that returning traffic
has to pass through the correct director. LVS-DR would probably work
fine, the real servers could then send the return traffic directly
back to the routers.
-Matt
-------------------------------------------------------------------
FWIW, I read somewhere that in this scenario you will want to run the
sync daemon as a master and a slave on both directors, so they will
merge their changes.
-C
<<winmail.dat>>
|
