lvs-users
|
To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [lvs-users] [LVS] How configuring LVS not to shut down current RTSP session if the monitoring scripts returns an unexpected answer? |
From: | Graeme Fowler <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 14 Jan 2008 09:51:49 +0000 |
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 01:45 -0800, Joseph Mack NA3T wrote: > Both of your questions seem to be about piranha than > LVS. Piranha is a RedHat product that has nothing to do with > us and which doesn't seem to be supported by RH. You might > find someone here who knows about Piranha, but there are > more people using keepalived and ldirectord here. ...that said, piranha is really just a wrapper around the Linux-HA toolset which limits the config choices you have. I'm not familiar with the Piranha GUI, but with nanny you can "quiesce" a server (ie. set weight to 0) instead of removing it from service when a check fails. It's the "-q" option. As Joe mentions, you may need to ask on a Redhat mailing list to find out how to use it. I'm damned if I can find it in the CentOS 5 piranha documentation. Graeme |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [lvs-users] [LVS] How configuring LVS not to shut down current RTSP session if the monitoring scripts returns an unexpected answer?, Joseph Mack NA3T |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [lvs-users] Weight being reset, Scott McClanahan |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [lvs-users] [LVS] How configuring LVS not to shut down current RTSP session if the monitoring scripts returns an unexpected answer?, Joseph Mack NA3T |
Next by Thread: | Re: [lvs-users] [LVS] How configuring LVS not to shut down current RTSP session if the monitoring scripts returns an unexpected answer?, Ben Hollingsworth |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |