lvs-users
|
To: | lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [lvs-users] LVS throughput limit (450k pps)? |
From: | Patrick Schreurs <pats@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:27:58 +0100 (CET) |
> Handling loadbalancing in softirq corner is, IMHO, not the best place > for performance. Softirq handling design become a performance bottlneck > catalysed by the democratization of SMP (multi-core) box. There is > alternative design but need to find time to work fulltime on this (I > have this on my TODO). The speed of a single core is just too slow. Balancing the interrupts over multiple CPU cores gives a performance penalty. What about MSI-X with multiqueue (like intel chipset 82575). Will that help. I haven't found a nic with that chipset yet, but that's a different story. -Patrick |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [lvs-users] Weight being reset, Scott McClanahan |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [lvs-users] Weight being reset, Joseph Mack NA3T |
Previous by Thread: | [lvs-users] Weight being reset, Scott McClanahan |
Next by Thread: | Re: [lvs-users] Fwd: Re: LVS throughput limit (450k pps)?, Alexandre Cassen |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |