lvs-users
|
To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [lvs-users] deciding among load balancers |
From: | Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:04:35 -0800 (PST) |
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, thushara wijeratna wrote: > [Is it correct that LVS provides failover semantics as well? tools external to LVS handle the failover. > Because > as far as I can tell, nginx doesn't, know nothing about it > to get around this, we use DNS > based mechanism so we have more than one nginx server registered, but > of course this is less than ideal] lvs was developed to get around the problems of DNS based load balancing Joe -- Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux! |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [lvs-users] install ipvsadm, Graeme Fowler |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [lvs-users] lvs-users Digest, Vol 61, Issue 14, adam chandley |
Previous by Thread: | [lvs-users] deciding among load balancers, thushara wijeratna |
Next by Thread: | Re: [lvs-users] deciding among load balancers, Greg |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |