LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [lvs-users] load balancing works... kinda

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] load balancing works... kinda
From: "Charlie Williams" <cwilliams.work@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:07:20 -0500
yes I setup the 3rd machine with all the same interfaces as the first two,
the loopback for the vip is there.

On Feb 13, 2008 3:04 PM, Graeme Fowler <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 14:51 -0500, Charlie Williams wrote:
> > that worked for the local server, then I attempted to setup a 3rd
> machine
> > solely running an apache server, ldirectord is able to reach its test
> page,
> > and indicates that the server is available, but requests are not getting
> > through from the virtual ip to the apache server (I see no accesses in
> the
> > apache log from anything other than ldirectord), I don't see any
> indication
> > of errors. Should I even be using direct routing? Would tunneling be a
> > better scalable solution anyway?
>
> Probably not, for a "local" networking setup (by which I mean all on the
> same backend subnet, or L2 collision domain).
>
> Does your third server have the VIP on a loopback (or other) alias?
> ldirectord queries the RIP for healthchecks, as I recall.
>
> Graeme
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>