|
Thanks for the reply Graeme,
Graeme Fowler wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 12:20 +0530, hirantha wrote:
>> Basically I don't administrate the firewalls, routers on the realserver
>> resides ISP. I think this is obvious --
>> most of people doesn't have network control on the ISP. But I can tell them
>> the situation. I would like to know what
>> would be on firewalls and routers to be eligible to establish lvs-tun. What
>> should I tell them..?
>
> The people administering the networks that the realservers live on need
> to allow egress (outbound) traffic from the VIP for LVS-TUN to work.
>
> Using TUN, the realservers reply directly to the clients:
>
> http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/VS-IPTunneling.html
>
Is there are users exists who using LVS-TUN, VPN or Layer2 network spanned..?
(who do not control
ISP level). Is there away we could accomplish this -- Global server load
balancing. I know some
commercial version of this but, I prefer something like LVS-tun.
I would appreciate if you could share your scenario with me.
Thanks and regards
-+> Hirantha
> If you have realservers on networks controlled by different providers,
> they probably won't advertise the VIP to their peers or permit traffic
> from the VIP to leave their network, especially if their upstreams apply
> filters to the announcements they receive. It would be seen as a form of
> spoofing.
>
> You can ask them to, but I suspect the answer will be no.
>
> Graeme
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
|
