LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [lvs-users] LDAP failover

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] LDAP failover
From: "Bruce Thompson" <thompson.bj@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 19:50:25 +1200
Hi Sylvain,

Yes, we only have two machines, so that will be the case alright. We did
wonder whether that would be the problem. Thank you very much for confirming
it.

Regards,
Bruce

2008/4/29 Sylvain Viart <sylvain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> Hi Bruce,
>
> Bruce Thompson a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > We have two directors which are also the real servers which host two
> > instances of LDAP (is it a problem for LVS to route to a local server
> I think it's the same problem, citation:
>
> If fact member of the LVS cannot use LVS.
>
>
> http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/mini-HOWTO/LVS-mini-HOWTO.html#gotchas
>
> > > To set up and test/run LVS, you need a minimum of 3 machines: client,
> > > director, realserver(s).
> > >
> > > From the outside, the LVS functions as one machine. The client cannot
> > > be one of the machines in the LVS (the director, or realserver). You
> > > need an outside client. If you try to access an LVS controlled service
> > > (eg http, smtp, telnet) from any of the machines in the LVS; access
> > > from the director will hang, access from a realserver will connect to
> > > the service locally, bypassing the LVS.
> >
> Is it your case?
>
> Does it work it you split on three physical distinct server?
>
> Regards,
> Sylvain.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>



-- 
m: +64 (0)21 962 085
h: +64 (0)4 384 8740
e: thompson.bj@xxxxxxxxx
skype: bjthompson

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>