|
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 04:21:41PM +0100, lists wrote:
>
> Solved this a while back but forgot to tell the list:
>
> Many thanks to Siim Põder for helping to port Carlos Lozano’s patch from
> 2.4 -> 2.6
> In order to run an SSL reverse proxy on the same node that is running LVS
> i.e.
>
> External client —> pound:443 –> Local:443 —> IPVS:80 —> RealServer
>
> Patch for 2.6.25 is here:
> http://www.loadbalancer.org/download/patches/ip_vs_locallvs.patch
>
> Kernel Build with patch for Centos5.1 here:
> http://www.loadbalancer.org/blog/?p=12
This really ought to get merged into the main code.
Are there known side effects? Can someone (i.e. the copyright holder) provide
a signoff line as per http://linux.yyz.us/patch-format.html ?
--
Horms
_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
