lvs-users
|
To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [lvs-users] RHEL/CentOS + Antefacto? |
From: | Brian Ghidinelli <brian@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 10 Sep 2008 10:38:31 -0700 |
Joseph Mack NA3T wrote: > I think all the Antefacto patches are in the kernel now (not > 100% sure - the final word is in the HOWTO). What isn't in > the kernel is in Julian's nfct patches. I didn't realize there was a difference... good to know. I am indeed talking about the nfct patches at http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nfct/. Sooo... anyone recompiled an RHEL/CentOS kernel with *those* patches? :) I'm trying to fix the problem of return packets from my real servers being killed as INVALID when combining iptables + lvs (in my case, keepalived). Thanks for the quick response Joe, Brian |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [lvs-users] RHEL/CentOS + Antefacto?, Joseph Mack NA3T |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [lvs-users] LVS-NAT Problems, Zack Gilburd |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [lvs-users] RHEL/CentOS + Antefacto?, Joseph Mack NA3T |
Next by Thread: | Re: [lvs-users] RHEL/CentOS + Antefacto?, Joseph Mack NA3T |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |