|
> this is in the HOWTO. LVS doesn't benefit from multiple
> CPUs (or it didn't last we looked)
Oops, it's been a few years since I read it. Sorry about that.
> What sort of packet throughput are you getting?
How would you like that measured?
> Are you using LVS-DR or LVS-NAT?
LVS-NAT
> Is the director doing anything else as well?
Aside from running heartbeat and ldirectord with 100+ virtual servers,
not too much. Here's the output from top:
top - 13:43:47 up 81 days, 9:12, 1 user, load average: 1.40, 1.42,
1.38
Tasks: 60 total, 1 running, 59 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 46.8% us, 3.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 48.8% id, 0.0% wa, 1.3% hi,
0.0% si
Mem: 516304k total, 506348k used, 9956k free, 45448k buffers
Swap: 1048568k total, 4k used, 1048564k free, 369656k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
2762 root 17 0 13708 9884 1744 S 50.4 1.9 13386:29 ldirectord
28957 root 15 0 7108 2320 1848 S 0.3 0.4 0:00.03 sshd
28993 root 16 0 1956 948 756 R 0.3 0.2 0:00.06 top
1 root 15 0 1688 568 488 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.95 init
2 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:01.00 ksoftirqd/0
3 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/0
4 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:01.54 events/0
5 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.78 khelper
6 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kthread
8 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.02 kblockd/0
9 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kacpid
97 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 khubd
99 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kseriod
146 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 pdflush
147 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.17 pdflush
148 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.08 kswapd0
149 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/0
303 root 11 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kpsmoused
322 root 11 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmirrord
335 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 2:02.22 kjournald
1164 root 11 -5 1588 468 384 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.01 udevd
1550 root 11 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 shpchpd
2064 root 11 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kauditd
2180 root 11 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kjournald
3017 root 15 0 1596 592 500 S 0.0 0.1 0:48.74 syslogd
3021 root 15 0 1548 384 312 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 klogd
3031 root 25 0 1544 440 368 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 acpid
3043 root 15 0 4068 1144 836 S 0.0 0.2 1:44.23 sshd
3105 ntp 15 0 4456 4456 3432 S 0.0 0.9 0:00.19 ntpd
3117 root 16 0 4524 944 536 S 0.0 0.2 0:47.57 crond
3140 xfs 15 0 3288 1572 796 S 0.0 0.3 0:00.01 xfs
3159 dbus 15 0 2440 812 672 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.07
dbus-daemon-1
3184 root 15 0 2648 972 804 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.16 ha_logd
3192 root 15 0 2648 556 392 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.15 ha_logd
3376 root -2 0 10812 10m 2492 S 0.0 2.1 4:11.26 heartbeat
3434 root 15 0 0 0 0 D 0.0 0.0 0:00.09
ipvs_syncmaster
3450 root -2 0 4216 4216 2492 S 0.0 0.8 0:00.00 heartbeat
3451 root -2 0 4212 4212 2492 S 0.0 0.8 0:06.50 heartbeat
3452 root -2 0 4392 4216 2492 S 0.0 0.8 0:08.15 heartbeat
3453 root -2 0 4212 4212 2492 S 0.0 0.8 0:05.60 heartbeat
3454 root -2 0 4212 4212 2492 S 0.0 0.8 4:17.47 heartbeat
3455 root -2 0 4212 4212 2492 S 0.0 0.8 0:05.64 heartbeat
3456 root -2 0 4212 4212 2492 S 0.0 0.8 4:26.11 heartbeat
3457 root -2 0 4212 4212 2492 S 0.0 0.8 0:09.36 heartbeat
3458 root -2 0 4212 4212 2492 S 0.0 0.8 2:47.11 heartbeat
3459 root -2 0 4344 4344 2492 S 0.0 0.8 0:50.39 heartbeat
3460 root -2 0 4344 4344 2492 S 0.0 0.8 10:51.33 heartbeat
3463 root 18 0 1532 412 356 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 mingetty
3520 root 18 0 1532 412 356 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 mingetty
3521 root 18 0 1532 412 356 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 mingetty
3522 root 18 0 1532 412 356 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 mingetty
3523 root 18 0 1532 412 356 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 mingetty
3545 root 18 0 1536 412 356 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 mingetty
3546 root 15 0 10824 2352 1932 S 0.0 0.5 0:00.04 gdm-binary
3782 hacluste 15 0 2648 1196 1000 S 0.0 0.2 0:10.95 ipfail
3908 root 16 0 11340 2192 1656 S 0.0 0.4 0:00.02 gdm-binary
3931 root 15 0 19100 8872 2468 S 0.0 1.7 0:07.02 X
3983 gdm 15 0 21368 11m 6512 S 0.0 2.3 0:06.26 gdmgreeter
4019 root 15 0 4456 1364 340 S 0.0 0.3 0:00.00 ntpd
28961 root 15 0 4428 1464 1188 S 0.0 0.3 0:00.02 bash
> Some nics are better at handling the packets on-board, but
> I don't know what they are. Have you looked into getting
> the best nics? From postings on this list you should avoid
> Broadcom. Some people like Intel.
They are all Intel. Two are on the motherboard and 1 is an add-in. I
have realservers on two different internal subnets.
--Eric
Disclaimer - October 31, 2008
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.. If you are not the named
addressee you should not disseminate, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any
views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and
might not represent those of . Warning: Although has taken reasonable
precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot
accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email
or attachments.
This disclaimer was added by Policy Patrol: http://www.policypatrol.com/
|
