Re: [lvs-users] Do newer LVS implementations allow hairpinning?

To: " users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] Do newer LVS implementations allow hairpinning?
From: Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 04:43:26 -0700 (PDT)
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009, Robinson, Eric wrote:

> Do newer LVS implementations allow hairpinning requests 
> back out the same interface they arrived on? In other 
> words, if my load balancer has virtual services listening 
> on its eth0, and the realservers are on eth1, is it 
> possible for a client computer on eth1

a client computer can be attached to any NIC on the 

> to connect to the VS on eth0 and be redirected back to one 
> of the RS's on eth1?

Provided you haven't done something to block the routing, it 
should work. I don't know what "newer LVS implementations" 
has to do with this

Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at 
Homepage It's GNU/Linux!

Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>