|
Am Dienstag, 30. Juni 2009 14:39:49 schrieb Olaf Krische:
> Thanks for answering to everyone,
>
> Malcolm Turnbull wrote:
> > Usually we use Direct Routing mode with proxies(squids) because it is:
> >
> > a) source ip transparent
> > b) return traffic doesn't need to go via the load balancer
> > c) its fast
>
> Okay, i will try this out. Tho, i am not a big fan of giving each squid an
> IP. I do not own a big block.
>
> I used to have a hardware loadbalancer, which owns the VIP. It would
> rewrite the incoming packet by replacing the VIP with the IP of the chosen
> real server in the LAN. And the real server then had to answer back to the
> loadbalancer, so he can replace the IP of the real server with the VIP
> again. It felt more...self describing and did not need a special
> configuration on the real servers except the routing.
Hi,
you can do the same config with LVS. Just use NAT mode. The disadvantage: it
does not scale that good because every traffix has to be routed back through
the
gateway. As a rule of the thumb you can tell: About 10 to 20 real servers in
NAT mode.
--
Dr. Michael Schwartzkopff
MultiNET Services GmbH
Addresse: Bretonischer Ring 7; 85630 Grasbrunn; Germany
Tel: +49 - 89 - 45 69 11 0
Fax: +49 - 89 - 45 69 11 21
mob: +49 - 174 - 343 28 75
mail: misch@xxxxxxxxxxx
web: www.multinet.de
Sitz der Gesellschaft: 85630 Grasbrunn
Registergericht: Amtsgericht München HRB 114375
Geschäftsführer: Günter Jurgeneit, Hubert Martens
---
PGP Fingerprint: F919 3919 FF12 ED5A 2801 DEA6 AA77 57A4 EDD8 979B
Skype: misch42
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
