|
Hi, Joe
>the sh scheduler is not well understood, by the users at
>least (including me). Are you saying that the lc scheduler
>sends new connections to realservers with weight=0?
The lc scheduler does not send new connections to realservers with weight=0.
^^^^^^^^^^
It's ok. But, the sh one "sends" ....
I hope that the sh is the same with lc.
Sincerely,
--
Mikio Kishi
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 3:36 AM, Joseph Mack NA3T<jmack@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jul 2009, Mikio Kishi wrote:
>
>> I hope that the sh scheduling module doesn't select target server whose
>> weight is 0, like lc, sed.
>
> the sh scheduler is not well understood, by the users at
> least (including me). Are you saying that the lc scheduler
> sends new connections to realservers with weight=0?
>
> Joe
>
> --
> Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
> jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
> generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
> Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
>
> _______________________________________________
> Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
> http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
>
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
