Re: [lvs-users] InActConn dilemma

To: " users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] InActConn dilemma
From: Graeme Fowler <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:33:10 +0000
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 16:25 +0100, Andre Magri wrote:
> IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096)
> Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
>   -> RemoteAddress:Port           Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
> FWM  80 wlc persistent 1200
>   ->        Route   1      359        146
>   ->        Route   1      127        *12176*
> The high rate of InActConn for www1 is worrying me.

That indicates one of several possible things:

1. www1 is handling more connections than www2, or
2. www1 is not closing connections properly

Are the webservers configured in the same way?

What do you see if you do:

ipvsadm -Ln --stats

Also, if you do this:

watch -n1 -- ipvsadm -Ln --rate

[use ctrl-c to exit]

what do you see? I'd surmise that www1 is handling a lot more traffic
than www2.


Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>