LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [lvs-users] ipvs local node broken since kernel 2.6.28

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] ipvs local node broken since kernel 2.6.28
From: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 09:23:43 +1100
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 02:15:25PM +0300, Deniss wrote:
> >> Simon Horman wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 03:49:24PM +0200, Deniss wrote:
> >>>> ipvs local node setup is broken since kernel 2.6.28
> >>> Unfortunately I'm not having any luck reproducing this on 2.6.28.
> >> i am running  2.6.28-r9 kernel
> >> any additional info u would like to get ?
> > 
> > What is 2.6.28-r9 and where did you get it? :-)
> > Is there any chance that you could check this
> > behaviour using a 2.6.28 from kernel.org?
> 
> it's surely 
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.28.9.tar.bz2

Thanks, I was confused by the -r9.

> but, once again - according to 
> http://lists.graemef.net/pipermail/lvs-users/2008-December/021707.html
> 
> "Local Connections
> -----------------
> 
> The change by Malcolm Turnbull and Siim Põder added support to allow
> connections from a local process to be load balanced.
> "
> 
> so as I understand that locally generated traffic SHOULD be forwarded to 
> remote real server and that happens as seen in tcpdump for me (but not 
> caught back).
> If Your cannot reproducing that, u probably do something totally wrong IMO.

Sorry, I miss understood the problem that you were describing.
I thought that you were referring to the real-server on the local-node.
I will poke a bit more.


_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/

LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>