|
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 01:39:24PM -0700, Sid Stuart wrote:
> I debugged the problem with your patch.
Thanks
> The patched ldirectord is not that
> illuminating though,
>
> [Thu May 6 13:03:15 2010|www.229|5621] system(/sbin/ipvsadm -e -t
> 216.246.59.229:5222 -r 172.20.1.104:5222 -m -w 5) failed to execute: No
> child processes
> [Thu May 6 13:03:15 2010|www.229|5621] Restored real server:
> 172.20.1.104:5222 (216.246.59.229:5222) (Weight set to 5)
> [Thu May 6 13:03:15 2010|www.229|5621] emailalert: Restored real server:
> 172.20.1.104:5222 (216.246.59.229:5222) (Weight set to 5)
> [Thu May 6 13:03:15 2010|www.229|5621] failed to send email message
> [Thu May 6 13:03:15 2010|www.229|5621] system(/sbin/ipvsadm -e -t
> 216.246.59.229:8000 -r 172.20.1.104:8000 -m -w 5) failed to execute: No
> child processes
> [Thu May 6 13:03:15 2010|www.229|5621] Restored real server:
> 172.20.1.104:8000 (216.246.59.229:8000) (Weight set to 5)
> [Thu May 6 13:03:15 2010|www.229|5621] emailalert: Restored real server:
> 172.20.1.104:8000 (216.246.59.229:8000) (Weight set to 5)
> [Thu May 6 13:03:15 2010|www.229|5621] failed to send email message
>
> Note that the "failed to send email message" errors are incorrect as well.
> The messages are actually sent.
Strange. It looks as if ldirectord failed to fork and exec ipvsadm,
but as your settings end up correct this seems unlikely. So I'm
left scratching my head again. Is memory particularly constrained on
the machine?
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
