Re: [lvs-users] IPv6 vs IPv4 fwmark services

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, wferi@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] IPv6 vs IPv4 fwmark services
From: Sohgo Takeuchi <sohgo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 13:04:45 +0900 (JST)
From: Ferenc Wagner <wferi@xxxxxxx>
> I'm running ldirectord with
> applied for better IPv6
> support.  Basically, it works fine, thanks for implementing this.  But I
> wonder whether there's a fundamental reason for not allowing IPv4 and
> IPv6 virtual services with the same fwmark, like
> virtual=1
>   [...]
> virtual6=1
>   [...]
> which results in
> Error [21297] reading file /etc/ at line 15: duplicate virtual 
> server
> if tried.  Is this only an overzealous sanity check in ldirectord, or
> are iptables and ip6tables fwmarks actually related somehow?

Thanks for the report.

When I enhanced the IPv6 support of ldirectord, I forgotten to
take care about this case. I also think that ldirectord should
support this case.

Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>