LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [lvs-users] Does LVS Choke a Little Bit Under High Load?

To: "David Coulson" <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] Does LVS Choke a Little Bit Under High Load?
From: "Robinson, Eric" <eric.robinson@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:38:03 -0700
> [root@ns1a ~]# ipvsadm -Lnc | wc -l
> 25375
> 
> I've seen it over 150k before, so ten thousand probably isn't 
> a big deal.
> 


That makes me feel better. I thought 800 virtual services was a lot. My
ldirectord.cf file is 5000+ lines. Apparently that's not as big a deal
as I thought? 

At 3:30 pm I have 3974 connections, but my clientelle works daytime
hours and the MTN, CST, and EST timezones have gone home already. I'll
know better tomorrow.

--Eric


























Disclaimer - March 24, 2011 
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for David Coulson,LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.. If you are 
not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute, copy or alter 
this email. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of 
the author and might not represent those of Physicians' Managed Care or 
Physician Select Management. Warning: Although Physicians' Managed Care or 
Physician Select Management has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no 
viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for 
any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachments. 
This disclaimer was added by Policy Patrol: http://www.policypatrol.com/

_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/

LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>