On 4/13/11 10:45 AM, Romain Meillon wrote:
> 16:31:55.428339 IP<CLIENT_IP>.59856> 10.254.0.100.25: S
> 4217040225:4217040225(0) win 8192<mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK>
> 16:31:55.428402 IP 10.254.0.100.25> <CLIENT_IP>.59856: S
> 2200826876:2200826876(0) ack 4217040226 win 5840<mss
> 1460,nop,nop,sackOK>
> 16:31:55.474609 IP<CLIENT_IP>.59856> 10.254.0.100.25: . ack 1 win 64240
> 16:31:55.505497 IP 10.254.0.100.25> <CLIENT_IP>.59856: P 1:49(48) ack
> 1 win 5840
> 16:31:58.505138 IP 10.254.0.100.25> <CLIENT_IP>.59856: P 1:49(48) ack
> 1 win 5840
>
> if someone can enlighten me i would be enjoyed :)
When you use Masq the response has to route back through the IPVS server
to 'un-NAT' the packet. You may be better off using direct/gateway
routing, which handles this type of asymmetric routing.
David
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|