|
If you use NAT, the balancer may become a bottleneck. May be it is
worth trying DR or TUN. DR is bood if your servers are all in one
network segment (logicaly), TUN can be used even throug routers
(different network segments). In both these variants return packets
won't travel back through balancer, but go directly to the client. In
general, it is a faster approach.
Or I did miss momething important?
- -
HUB
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Mario Remy Almeida
<malmeida@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I need to do layer-7 load balancing.
>
> Bit confuse which one to you.
>
> VS/NAT
> VS/TUN
> VS/DR
>
> My all sever would be in 1 data centre location. VS/NAT would be the
> solution for me, but can someone confirm this?
>
> And also can I do SSL off-loading on LVS?
> *
> ***
>
> _______________________________________________
> Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
> http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
>
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
