Re: [lvs-users] in, the meaning of 'checkcount' is ambiguo

To: "Robinson, Eric" <eric.robinson@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] in, the meaning of 'checkcount' is ambiguous
Cc: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 08:01:39 +0900
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 08:03:29AM -0700, Robinson, Eric wrote:
> > Hi Eric,
> > 
> > before upgrading I would check the source code to see if 
> > checkcount (or some other option) meets your requirements.
> > 
> Okay. That sees like an unusual suggestion. Usually the standard
> recommendation is to upgrade to the latest version, especially when the
> one in use is 5 years old. :-)

Just an idea as I got the feeling that an upgrade wouldn't bring
any other benefits to you.

Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>