Re: [lvs-users] Is --timeout intended as non-persistent?

To: " users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] Is --timeout intended as non-persistent?
From: Malcolm Turnbull <malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 17:02:11 +0100

I don't think anyone will be too worried about how Piranha works on this list...
But most people just put the TCP timeout settings in rc.local or
rc.firewall or some other bootscript as they are non-persistent.

On 27 July 2011 15:43, Kendrick Gay <kgay@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It looks like they're asking how to set the TCP timeout value persistently, 
> as opposed to a virtual service?
> I apologies in advance for my ignorance of LVS. Let me give you my client's 
> inquiries in their own words, as I believe they explain it a bit clearer:


Malcolm Turnbull. Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779

Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>