LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [lvs-users] Is --timeout intended as non-persistent?

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] Is --timeout intended as non-persistent?
From: Malcolm Turnbull <malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 17:02:11 +0100
Kendrick,

I don't think anyone will be too worried about how Piranha works on this list...
But most people just put the TCP timeout settings in rc.local or
rc.firewall or some other bootscript as they are non-persistent.



On 27 July 2011 15:43, Kendrick Gay <kgay@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It looks like they're asking how to set the TCP timeout value persistently, 
> as opposed to a virtual service?
>
> I apologies in advance for my ignorance of LVS. Let me give you my client's 
> inquiries in their own words, as I believe they explain it a bit clearer:
>


-- 
Regards,

Malcolm Turnbull.

Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/

_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/

LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>