Re: [lvs-users] Ignoring ARP on *all* interfaces? Docs seem to say so

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] Ignoring ARP on *all* interfaces? Docs seem to say so
From: "L.S. Keijser" <leon@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 11:54:14 +0200
On Sat, 2011-10-15 at 19:45 +0000, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> > Some people will ignore ARP for all interfaces. This is wrong.
>       Most of the trivial LVS and non-LVS setups can work with
> all.arp_ignore = 1, that is how other networking stacks react to
> ARP requests - the requested address must be on same interface.
> It works when IPs from same subnet are configured only on one
> interface. LVS setups can use this restriction to configure VIPs
> on lo, dummy or any other interface that is different from
> the concerned interface with ARP traffic.

Of course. Was being too focused on only 0 / 1 as an option. Too
involved with another application, I'm afraid.

Sorry for the noise.



Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>