|
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 11:16:10AM +1300, Roger Littin wrote:
> Hi Wang,
>
> I have had similar problems where the director thinks the packet size is
> larger than mtu of the real
> server and sends back this message. Do you see anything in wireshark to
> indicate this. Overly
> large udp packet size?
>
> I think when the network layer hands off the packet to lvs, it may have
> already reassembled any
> fragments and then when lvs hands it back to the network layer, it is
> rejected because it is too
> large.
Hi Roger,
if you are seeing that problem then I suggest turning off
both GRO and LRO on the interface on the director that receives
the packets.
e.g.
# ethtool -k eth0 | egrep '(receive-offload)'
generic-receive-offload: on
large-receive-offload: on
# ethtool -K eth0 lro off
# ethtool -K eth0 gro off
# ethtool -k eth0 | egrep '(receive-offload)'
generic-receive-offload: off
large-receive-offload: off
IPVS may be used in conjunction with GRO since 2.6.39,
so it should not be necessary to disable GRO if
a 2.6.39 is used.
IPVS is not compatible with LRO as of 3.1 (or 3.2, when it is released)
LRO is specific to TCP.
GRO affects both TCP and UDP (and other protocols IIRC).
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
