LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [lvs-users] Question on SH scheduler

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] Question on SH scheduler
Cc: Khosrow Ebrahimpour <khosrow.ebrahimpour@xxxxxxxx>, krishna prasad <krishna.sirigiri@xxxxxxxxx>
From: Alexander Holler <holler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 05:34:38 +0100
Hello,

Am 28.02.2012 04:26, schrieb krishna prasad:

>     But I strongly think that it it good to have IP+port hashing, for cases
> where multiple clients run on single host, in this case
> the connections have same IP but different port. In this case also the same
> is desirable,i.e same client to the same real-server.
> This may not make a real use case for web world, but a strong case for
> non-web deployments like in telecom.I know LVS is increasingly used in
> other than web services.

What should be the use case for this? Source ports are almost always 
choosen randomly, so you woould get the same results as balancing randomly.

Regards,

Alexander

_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/

LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>