|
Hi
Zhongkang Lao wrote on 05.12.2012 08:41:
> I have already googled this like a hundred of times, but I got nothing.
> I didn't find any page or any article explain this.
> I'm sure someone here can explain this.
> So sorry to bother you guys here.
I don't have any answers, but I can confirm the problem (and the
workaround) on a box running Debian "Squeeze" with 2.6.32 directing
traffic from a VIP bound to lo via NAT to an active/backup bonding
interface on the backend. With "gro on" for the bonded interfaces to the
backend real servers, throughput was ~64K/s. With "gro off" it was
~50MB/s. It's not a general networking problem since a direct connection
to the real server via a DNAT port forward was not impacted.
>From what I gleaned from a cursory look with tcpdump it seems that the
problem is caused by incorrectly calculated tcp checksums.
Anybody interested in pursuing this further?
Cheers,
Thomas
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
