You can, and you setup is still okay, except you specified that one realserver has weight '1' and the other '2'. Meaning of every 3 active connections, two will go to 192.168.3.3 and one will go to 1
what if i want to distributed my incoming req to two different servers.?? _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.
A request always goes to 1 realserver, not both. Second, you have set 2 different weights to your realservers. Therefor, if the 192.168.3.3 server (weight 2) has finished handling the 'request' and t
Hi I have configured LVS router and two real servers(Windows 2003) butpackets are e going to only one server not other one and i am using piranha tool .Please help me this is my first installation. T
Hi request is going to one real server not to both real server . Please suggest TCP 122.166.233.136:80 wlc -> 192.168.3.2:80 Masq 1 0 0 -> 192.168.3.3:80 Masq 2 0 0 TCP 122.166.233.136:5000 wlc TCP 1
Hi this is my routing tables 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 122.166.233.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 192.168.122.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 virbr0 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255
Yes, that won't work - If squid is running on lvs router, and pointed at vip, it's not going to route via lvs. You can't run a lvs client on the lvs router, and in this case squid is the lvs client a
I have squid on lvs router cause my real servers on diif n/w so add squid proxy on lvs and gave real server ip address of my lvs router may be this can be reason i cant access my application using VI
All I see in your tcpdump is ports 22 and 443. Can you only capture the packets related to the LVS connection? You also need to do the capture on the real server, since that is probably where the iss
Hi I Have reconfigured everything below are the details this is my ifconfig eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:E8:F6:74:DA inet addr:122.166.233.133 Bcast:122.166.233.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6
Hi, Am 20.03.2012 13:15, schrieb Reet Vyas: Without knowledge about the client, we can't tell. In theory yes, it should work (just looking at the lvs configuration). For now I simply ignore your seco
What does your real server see? Only include packets related to your LVS traffic, and make sure you display it as IPs and numeric ports (tcpdump -nn). David __________________________________________
You need to do a packet capture or something to figure out what is not working. You can't test from the lvs router. You need a separate client. Sent from my iPhone ___________________________________
I did that but still no luck I just want to know wat i am trying to configure is correct or not .. Can i access url from VIP as 192.168.3.10:8080 or not? this is the VIP of my lvs router and it is wo
http://kb.linuxvirtualserver.org/wiki/Windows_Servers_in_LVS/DR_and_LVS/TUN_Clusters _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
Change it to use DR mode, then on each of your real servers do: iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -d 192.168.3.10 -j REDIRECT does it work then? _______________________________________________ Please rea
Its yep I am using NAT for this lvs setup gateway of realserver is vip of my lvs router. Is this wrong?? If u can pleas suggest how to do it i wasted my three days still no results :( _______________
Piranha was removed from Fedora 17, which implies that it will be removed from the next release of RedHat Enterprise Linux. As that's some time away, it's going to be around for a while yet. Looking
Actually, piranha is supported on el6. I must have been thinking of something else. ldirectord is much better, but I don't believe RedHat ship that with el6. _________________________________________