Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+UDP\s+load\s+balancing\s+$Virtual\s+server$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+UDP\s+load\s+balancing\s+$Virtual\s+server$\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [lvs-users] UDP load balancing (Virtual server) (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2018 14:01:20 +0200 (EET); Hello, Probably, IPVS sysctl var "conntrack" is set to 0 and IPVS switches conntracks for its flying packets to notrack mode. As result, NF conntracks are created and destroyed for every packet which; /html/lvs-users/2018-11/msg00003.html (14,975 bytes)
2. Re: [lvs-users] UDP load balancing (Virtual server) (score: 1): Author: Simon Bernard <contact@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 18:28:53 +0100; I tried to experiment this use case and faced this behavior... Let's say I have a client C1 with IP address : C1IP. A loadbalancer server LB with virtual IP address : VIP. 2 cluster-nodes (R1 and R2); /html/lvs-users/2018-11/msg00002.html (14,120 bytes)
3. [lvs-users] UDP load balancing (Virtual server) (score: 1): Author: Simon Bernard <contact@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 14:59:54 +0100; Hi, I would like to understand if it's possible to hide a cluster of servers behind 1 public IP address. Communication between my clients and my server is done over UDP. Communication can be initiate; /html/lvs-users/2018-11/msg00001.html (9,283 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]