Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*get\s+rid\s+of\s+the\s+address_space\s+override\s+in\s+setsockopt\s+v2\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*get\s+rid\s+of\s+the\s+address_space\s+override\s+in\s+setsockopt\s+v2\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. RE: get rid of the address_space override in setsockopt v2 (score: 1): Author: David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 14:09:09 +0000; I did more 'homework' than sometimes :-) Slightly difficult without a searchable net-next tree. However, as has been pointed out is a different thread this code is used to update IPv6 flow labels: an; /html/lvs-devel/2020-07/msg00138.html (16,355 bytes)
2. Re: get rid of the address_space override in setsockopt v2 (score: 1): Author: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 14:48:14 +0100; Really? Care to provide some details, or is it another of your "I can't be possibly arsed to check what I'm saying, but it stands for reason that..." specials?; /html/lvs-devel/2020-07/msg00137.html (14,960 bytes)
3. RE: get rid of the address_space override in setsockopt v2 (score: 1): Author: David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 09:51:45 +0000; Hmmm... this code does: int __sys_setsockopt(int fd, int level, int optname, char __user *user_optval, int optlen) { sockptr_t optval; char *kernel_optval = NULL; int err, fput_needed; struct socket; /html/lvs-devel/2020-07/msg00132.html (17,161 bytes)
4. Re: get rid of the address_space override in setsockopt v2 (score: 1): Author: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 00:46:44 -0700 (PDT); I already fixed this in net-next.; /html/lvs-devel/2020-07/msg00131.html (12,228 bytes)
5. Re: get rid of the address_space override in setsockopt v2 (score: 1): Author: Andreas Schwab <schwab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 09:08:42 +0200; I think there is a word missing after pretty. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something complete; /html/lvs-devel/2020-07/msg00130.html (12,953 bytes)
6. Re: get rid of the address_space override in setsockopt v2 (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 09:03:11 +0200; The buildbot found one warning with the isdn debug code after a few days, here is what I think is the best fix: -- The %p won't work with the new sockptr_t type. But in the times of ftrace, bpftrace; /html/lvs-devel/2020-07/msg00129.html (13,856 bytes)
7. Re: get rid of the address_space override in setsockopt v2 (score: 1): Author: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 15:43:42 -0700 (PDT); Series applied to net-next, I'm build testing and will push this out when that is done. Thanks.; /html/lvs-devel/2020-07/msg00128.html (12,928 bytes)
8. get rid of the address_space override in setsockopt v2 (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 08:08:42 +0200; Hi Dave, setsockopt is the last place in architecture-independ code that still uses set_fs to force the uaccess routines to operate on kernel pointers. This series adds a new sockptr_t type that can; /html/lvs-devel/2020-07/msg00108.html (17,669 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]