|
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 01:51:25PM +0900, Sohgo Takeuchi wrote:
>
>
> From: Sohgo Takeuchi <sohgo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> |
> > I found a bug in ldirectord and attach a patch to fix this
> > problem to this E-mail.
> >
> > The bug is that if a port is omitted in a "fallback" in a
> > virtual section, the entry is never seen in the virtual server
> > table even if all real servers are down.
> >
> > virtual=10.10.100.1:daytime
> > real=10.10.100.2:daytime gate
> > fallback=127.0.0.1
> >
> > A debug message says like this.
> >
> > DEBUG2: Running system(/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t 10.10.100.1:13 -r 127.0.0.1:
> > -g -w 1)
> > Running system(/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t 10.10.100.1:13 -r 127.0.0.1: -g -w 1)
> > illegal real server address[:port] specified
> > DEBUG2: system(/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t 10.10.100.1:13 -r 127.0.0.1: -g -w
> > 1) failed:
> > system(/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t 10.10.100.1:13 -r 127.0.0.1: -g -w 1) failed:
> >
> >
> > The problem in the source code is that when a port of "fallback"
> > is omitted, the port is derived from a port specified in a
> > "virtual" service (from a behavior of the parse_fallback
> > function), but the port is used before it is defined.
> >
> > I tested ldirectord on Ubuntu 10.04 with perl 5.10.1.
> >
> > with best regards,
>
> Does anyone have an interest in this bug?
Sorry, I missed your previous post.
I have pushed your patch into the agents tree.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|
