LVS
lvs-devel
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [PATCH] Sloppy TCP, SH rebalancing, SHP scheduling

To: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Sloppy TCP, SH rebalancing, SHP scheduling
Cc: lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Alexander Frolkin <avf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 09:38:06 +0100
Hi,

> > Is there a reason why the SH fallback behaviour shouldn't be default?
> > That is, is there a reason why the current behaviour (client connection
> > gets reset if it is directed to a realserver with weight 0) is
> > desirable?
> I don't know, the authors preferred this behaviour.

Is it worth looking at changing this?  Or is this going to be too
difficult a change to push through?

I just don't understand why rejecting a client connection when there are
servers available is desirable behaviour.


Alex

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>