|
Hello,
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014, Alex Gartrell wrote:
> Previously, only the four high bits of the tclass were maintained in the
> ipv6 case. This matches the behavior of ipv4, though whether or not we
> should reflect ECN bits may be up for debate.
Agreed, RFC 3168 9.1 has some recommendations
and more changes may be needed, eg. by using
INET_ECN_encapsulate as in other tunnels:
ip6_flow_hdr(iph, INET_ECN_encapsulate(inner_dsfield, inner_dsfield), 0);
> Signed-off-by: Alex Gartrell <agartrell@xxxxxx>
So far,
Acked-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
> ---
> net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c
> index c47444e..28ee592 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c
> @@ -967,8 +967,8 @@ ip_vs_tunnel_xmit_v6(struct sk_buff *skb, struct
> ip_vs_conn *cp,
> iph->nexthdr = IPPROTO_IPV6;
> iph->payload_len = old_iph->payload_len;
> be16_add_cpu(&iph->payload_len, sizeof(*old_iph));
> - iph->priority = old_iph->priority;
> memset(&iph->flow_lbl, 0, sizeof(iph->flow_lbl));
> + ipv6_change_dsfield(iph, 0, ipv6_get_dsfield(old_iph));
> iph->daddr = cp->daddr.in6;
> iph->saddr = saddr;
> iph->hop_limit = old_iph->hop_limit;
> --
> 1.8.1
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|
