LVS
lvs-devel
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [PATCH] ipvs: use div_s64 for signed division

To: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipvs: use div_s64 for signed division
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jiri Wiesner <jwiesner@xxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, coreteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 11:10:41 +0100
Hi Julian,

On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 09:01:59PM +0200, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> 
>       Hello,
> 
> On Thu, 15 Dec 2022, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> 
> > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > do_div() is only well-behaved for positive numbers, and now warns
> > when the first argument is a an s64:
> > 
> > net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_est.c: In function 'ip_vs_est_calc_limits':
> > include/asm-generic/div64.h:222:35: error: comparison of distinct pointer 
> > types lacks a cast [-Werror]
> >   222 |         (void)(((typeof((n)) *)0) == ((uint64_t *)0));  \
> >       |                                   ^~
> > net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_est.c:694:17: note: in expansion of macro 'do_div'
> >   694 |                 do_div(val, loops);
> 
>       net-next already contains fix for this warning
> and changes val to u64.

Arnd's patch applies fine on top of net-next, maybe he is addressing
something else?

> > Convert to using the more appropriate div_s64(), which also
> > simplifies the code a bit.
> > 
> > Fixes: 705dd3444081 ("ipvs: use kthreads for stats estimation")
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_est.c | 6 ++----
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_est.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_est.c
> > index ce2a1549b304..dbc32f8cf1f9 100644
> > --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_est.c
> > +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_est.c
> > @@ -691,15 +691,13 @@ static int ip_vs_est_calc_limits(struct netns_ipvs 
> > *ipvs, int *chain_max)
> >             }
> >             if (diff >= NSEC_PER_SEC)
> >                     continue;
> > -           val = diff;
> > -           do_div(val, loops);
> > +           val = div_s64(diff, loops);
> 
>       On CONFIG_X86_32 both versions execute single divl
> for our case but div_s64 is not inlined. I'm not expert in
> this area but if you think div_u64 is more appropriate then
> post another patch. Note that now val is u64 and
> min_est is still s32 (can be u32).
> 
> >             if (!min_est || val < min_est) {
> >                     min_est = val;
> >                     /* goal: 95usec per chain */
> >                     val = 95 * NSEC_PER_USEC;
> >                     if (val >= min_est) {
> > -                           do_div(val, min_est);
> > -                           max = (int)val;
> > +                           max = div_s64(val, min_est);
> >                     } else {
> >                             max = 1;
> >                     }
> > -- 
> > 2.35.1
> 
> Regards
> 
> --
> Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>