Re: LVS-NAT

[Thornton Prime <thornton@xxxxxxxxx>]

> Robert Carroll wrote:
> 
> Stupid question maybe.. using lvs_nat.. does the director have to be
> on two different network segments, or can it be the same?
> 
> for example
>     director IP: 192.168.168.126
>     VIP: 192.168.168.200
>     real1: 192.168.168.121
>     real2: 192.168.168.125
> 
> I know this may look dumb.. but just wonder if it would work?

I think it would probably work, but as far as I can see you would be
taking on all the disadvantages of NAT and eliminating most of its
advantages.

thornton