LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: LVS and ethernet Bridgeing

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, serge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: LVS and ethernet Bridgeing
From: Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 14:55:17 -0400
Serge Sozonoff wrote:

> Well this would I guess give me LVS-DR without the ARP headache for one.

That was my original idea. From what Horms said, it won't fly, since
the director sees all the packets anyhow.

You can use the director as the default gw for VS-DR if you use
Julian's martian modification (see the HOWTO), which is now
included with his hidden patch for 2.4 (look for the hidden-forward-shared
patch) - you apply the patch to the director and the realservers -
on the director you're using the forward-shared patch. On the 
realservers you're using the hidden patch (although if you've set
the routing up correctly, the realservers can't directly receive
packets from the client, and you don't need the hidden patch)

My configure script can set this up for you.

Joe
-- 
Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, Lockheed Martin
contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center, 
mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>