LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [PATCH-2.5] spelling fixes

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-2.5] spelling fixes
From: Roberto Nibali <ratz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 06:57:19 +0200
Hello Wensong,

Well, please don't make things complicated. IPVS only works on layer-4, cannot balance the load well among the servers for all the situations. For example, if there are active connections, some may have other traffic, and some may be idle; some may cause the server run big tasks, some may just run small tasks. Maybe a lot connections of bit tasks are sent to the same server, it cause the server overloaded, though the number of active connections to the server is less than that of other servers.

For well-balanced solutions, it is good to use dynamic-feedback weight adaption in the user-space.

Ok, agreed.

BTW, we have the hprio scheduler active now plus some fugly hack for the masquerading timer (why can't we reset the slow timer for masq entries in 2.2.x in a normal way???). The hprio scheduler offers some new cool setup solutions which I will write down and make a proposal. With it you can have higher page request starvation granularity.

We'll discuss the open points at OLS with Lars, Horms, Joe, whoever joins. If you want us to discuss anything else, let us know.

As you've probably seen, Linus has announced the 2.6.0-test series with the last 2.5.x kernel. I guess we need to hurry up a little with inclusion or think about a good reason in case of later inclusion. Maybe we do add the overflow pool server mechanims first and will then submit for inclusion.


Yes, it's probably good to ask now, we will add the overflow pool later.

We can start now, 2.6.0-test1 has been released with the IPVS layer :)

Thank you and have a nice day,
Roberto Nibali, ratz
--
echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln256%Pln256/snlbx]sb3135071790101768542287578439snlbxq'|dc

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>